Legislature Considers State Biotech Recruitment/ Retention Position
The Assembly Appropriations Committee
weighed a bill that would create a new
state government position aimed at
retaining biotechnology employers in
California, and attracting additional life
sciences employers to the state.
AB1733, introduced by Assembly Member
Hill and coauthored by Assembly Members
Ammiano, Anderson, Block, Caballero,
Coto, Fletcher, Fong, Galgiani, Harkey,
Hayashi, Audra Strickland, Swanson,
Torlakson, and Villines, along with Senator
Wyland, called for the state to hire a
director of California biotechnology
retention and recruitment within the
office of the governor. The bill required the
director to be "responsible for serving as an
informational resource for biotechnology,
life science, and medical companies, as
specified." The position would cost an
estimated $300,000 to support a high level
staff member conversant in biotechnology
generally and life science regulatory affairs
specifically, as well as a half-time support
staff and a travel budget to support out-ofstate
travel.
The bill follows on a series of hearings
conducted by the Assembly Select
Committee on Biotechnology during 2009 and 2010, which found that
California biotechnology companies
need assistance with complying with
regulatory requirements imposed by state
and local governments. The hearings also
revealed that California biotechnology
companies are locating satellite facilities
and manufacturing facilities outside
of California, because other states are
providing incentives and assistance that
California does not provide. According
to survey released by the California
Healthcare Institute in January 2010,
two-thirds of executives at California
biomedical companies indicated they
expected to expand their out-of-state
manufacturing operations over the next
two years. Only 30 percent of executives
anticipated expanding manufacturing
within the state.
Although AB 1733 passed the state Assembly's
health, business and professions
committees, it did not make it out of
appropriations. However, interest in
facilitating biotech recruitment at the
state level is manifest and further follow
up to the Assembly Select Committee on
Biotechnology hearings is possible.